this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
1824 readers
542 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Oh yeah, from the article it sounds like the entire town is funded off of high pressure civil asset forfeiture.
The politicians who created the bill to eliminate civil asset forfeiture in Nebraska are idiots though. They didn't notice the loopholes of it still being allowed if there's any suspicion of drugs, or if the amount is over $25k? It's their job, and the job of their supporting staff, to read the bills they're proposing and passing and make sure stuff like this doesn't happen. Saying they're upset it still exists despite their efforts just emphasizes how incompetent they are at passing working laws.
I remember when Kucinich was asked why he didn't hop in line and vote for the PATRIOT ACT (fucked up name btw), and he replied because he read it. When the follow up was about why he read it and he replied that it was his job to do so. He was also against the Bush wars, so of course he got primaried. The boys at the top, they don't like waves.
Oh yeah, the Patriot act was the biggest victory any terrorists could've hoped to gain over the US. People still get offended when I say that our modern security state means the terrorists, at least to some extent, won. They destroyed an important part of the fabric of our society.
You're assuming they actually want to stop the practice. More likely they want to look like they're stopping the practice.