this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Thunderbird

900 readers
5 users here now

Thunderbird is the leading free and open-source email, calendaring, newsfeed, and chat client with more than 20 million active monthly users across Windows, macOS, and Linux. One of Thunderbird's core principles is the use and promotion of open and decentralized standards.

This is an unofficial forum for Mozilla Thunderbird and feel free to join and discuss

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I use gmail but I'm looking to find another free provider to move. I've considered proton or tutonota but neither seem to support thunderbird without payment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, you're paying for increased privacy in money and (imo) security.

I begrudgingly stick with gmail every time I consider otherwise, and having one of the world's biggest IT security teams keeping it safe is one of the reasons. It's unfortunately how much they get to harvest my data, but I suppose I'd rather them than a scammer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't see how an encrypted service like TN or PM would be less safe than gmail. Quite contrary. Leaks so often come from insiders.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I've been through quite a few security audits, and had to steel-clad quite a few secure systems. Nothing is better than having a dedicated security team for those things. The bigger the better. There's a reason we teach junior developers not to write any "secure" code, even as simple as a login system, on their own.

I can understand why someone might "not see", but as someone who has seen security done wrong enough times by well-meaning small businesses, I trust the company with the bigger dedicated security team with the better-skilled experts.

What's left is the fact that "everyone will want to hack gmail, but nobody would try to hack TN or PM". Fair enough. But as that taught us growing up: "security through obscurity isn't".

I don't fault people who prefer using these smaller "privacy" companies. But please don't fault people who prefer to stick with the companies who stand tall through constant attacks.