this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
585 points (98.7% liked)

World News

31911 readers
730 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 114 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

If we want authors to survive, we’ve got to stop assuming that authors’ intellectual labour is a public commodity.

Ah yes, because it's the fault of (internet) libraries and not greedy publishers who try to keep the royalties for their authors as low as possible. /s

How about looking where this problem starts instead of where it ends?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

If we want authors to survive, we’ve got to stop assuming that authors’ intellectual labour is a public commodity.

The irony being that this is exactly what copyright was originally intended to facilitate - authors creating works to become public domain within a relatively short period of time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

There are authors starting to publish without a publisher. I think that is the right direction, not making all books free. Maybe once the publishers have less control there will be some copyright reforms to shorten the time it takes to bring works into the public domain. Right now it is 95 years from publishing, but I think the author's life plus 30 years or something might make a bit more sense. For example, George Orwell has been dead for over 70 years, but his works are still under copyright.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Especially fucking Wiley. If you're a student paying hundreds for a textbook with a "supplemental code" that makes it so you can't buy it used, then it's probably by fucking Wiley. Fucking greedy cunts.