this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
432 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

7224 readers
344 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to a new report from Rentals, In July, the Canadian rental market hit a record high with an average asking rent of $2,078, marking an 8.9 per cent annual increase.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yes, because landlords as a very base idea should not exist. Sure you're being a "good" landlord, but the concept itself is having other people pay for the thing you own, while they get nothing of that investment.

[–] terath 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The idea that landlords shouldn't exist is one of the most ignorant and thoughtless rage memes going around right now. There are many many many situations where people need to rent rather than purchase, and without landlords there is no renting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rentals can (and should!) exist without landlords.

[–] terath 1 points 1 year ago

Someone has to own the building genius. That person is the landord. The only alternative to having a corporation or individual as the landlord, is having the government or a coop as a landlord. There is a place for those, but sorry I'm not for communism, that can't be the only option as otherwise we run into the well known problems with communism, no competition leads to shit quality, which is generally what you get from government run housing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)