this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
51 points (88.1% liked)

Drama in the Fediverse

1087 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the Lemmy Drama community!

This is a place to share and enjoy drama across the fediverse. Grab your popcorn, and dive in!

Rules:

1. Don't bring your own drama.


If you are a part of the drama, don't post it here. We're here to enjoy drama, not see it brought to this community.


2. Be civil.


No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. No ongoing drama.


if there’s been a comment in the past 3 days, wait until it’s settled down.


5. No interacting with the drama you find here.


That means no upvotes, no downvotes, and no commenting in the original thread.


6. Keep the drama focused on Lemmy and/or the fediverse only.


If it’s Kbin or Mastodon drama, it must be a quality effort post.


7. Don’t piss on the popcorn.


Inciting brigades is an automatic ban.


8. Mod Perogative


We reserve the right to enforce the rules however we like.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

there was an update from the admins of lemmy.nsfw where language barriers got in the way and the wrong impression was made, which was quickly addressed by the instance's other admin as well as edited by its' original author.

this got people in this instance concerned until the edit was made, however in two threads about it on kbin social the anime PFPs came out to play and the head admin of dataterm was obligated to comment as well

the funniest part is, it really demonstrates the truth of stereotypes about people with anime loli PFPs. at least a couple of the commenters in those threads are going to end up on watchlists.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

can contribute to an environment that trivializes or normalizes such exploitation.

Explain how. What does this "normalization" look like? What examples are there?

It’s about maintaining the inviolability and innocence of childhood, a value deeply ingrained in our society.

Yet we're totally fine showing violence to children? Even violence perpetrated on children, as long as it's not sexual? Is this also why you don't support sex ed for children?

I just find it really weird that you can't distinguish fantasy from reality.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get where you’re coming from with the video games comparison, but we’re talking apples and oranges here. The two just aren’t the same. Violent video games, sure, they’re a problem, and I’m not a fan of those either, especially when kids are involved. But this loli content? That’s another level for me.

We’re dealing with stuff that inherently sexualizes minors, albeit in a fictional realm. When something like this becomes just ‘another thing’, a part of everyday life, people may start shrugging off the real-life equivalent too. And that’s what worries me.

Sex education, by the way, isn’t even in the same ballpark. It’s about teaching kids the facts of life, about relationships, about consent. It’s about protection, not exploitation.

As for telling reality from fantasy, most people, sure, they can do that. For me, the line’s pretty clear. Anything that makes it okay to sexualize kids, real or not, that’s a step too far.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

undefined> but we’re talking apples and oranges here. The two just aren’t the same.

They're by definition not the same because they're different things, but I don't see why the argument is different.

Violent video games, sure, they’re a problem

Why are they a problem?

When something like this becomes just ‘another thing’, a part of everyday life, people may start shrugging off the real-life equivalent too. And that’s what worries me.

Is there even 1 shred of evidence that this has happened or is even about to happen?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve come across some studies on this stuff. One study I found actually found a connection between violent video games and aggressive behavior in teenagers. Now, it wasn’t a massive correlation, but it’s something worth keeping an eye on (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/1850198).

As for evidence of normalization, it’s tricky. The concept of normalization doesn’t necessarily imply a direct cause-effect relationship, like ‘X’ content led to ‘Y’ real-world behavior. It’s more about subtle shifts in societal attitudes over time. It’s challenging to directly measure these shifts, but there are sociological studies that suggest media consumption can influence perceptions and attitudes.(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/22223200_Living_With_Television_The_Violence_Profile)

So, my concerns about Loli aren’t pulled out of thin air. It’s about the potential shift in our societal attitudes towards child exploitation. It’s not easy to put hard numbers on these effects, but given what we know about the impact of media, I think we should avoid it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

undefined> It’s more about subtle shifts in societal attitudes over time.

Has there been any evidence whatsoever that society has gotten more permissive with regard to being sexually active with actual children?

So, my concerns about Loli aren’t pulled out of thin air.

But you just described how there's no evidence.

but given what we know about the impact of media, I think we should avoid it.

Lol what? That's not how any of this works. We should only be banning things that we can actually say are harmful.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Keep moving the goal post.