this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
153 points (90.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

34847 readers
507 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Observers on a boat using acoustic equipment reported four unidentified "gloops" but then realised their recording device wasn't plugged in.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

This whole "Nessie" thing counts as mildly infuriating to me at this point. The whole loch ness monster thing was a fun thing to wonder about as child, but are people really taking it "seriously?" I'm not even sure if this article was written as a serious news story or not, it's certainly light on substantial new evidence, but then it's a BBC article not presented as satire - are we supposed to all be in on the tired joke or is there really something new and substantial there?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First heard about this major new search a few weeks back, and was entirely unsurprised to hear that one of the main organisers was... the local Loch Ness Visitor Centre, who by no means have a vested interest in keeping this nonsense going...

Pretty sick of seeing the story given coverage by the BBC, the Guardian, etc, at a time when their resources would be better spent on proper news.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Light local news isn't covered by the same team, let people enjoy things and have a little fun in life. It is silly but it's not like every town has local legend about a mythical dinosaur living in it's lake, why wish it dead.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I always just figure these sorts of claims are done with a wink and a nod as a sort of traditional joke.

Camera technology may have progressed to insanely high quality, but any picture of Nessie or Bigfoot will always be taken with a potato.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a stunt to encourage tourism to the area. You don't need to get upset about people having a bit of fun.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I don't get upset about people having a bit of fun, but my personal opinion is that this joke is tired and there's a standard for news stories.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There's a massive tourism industry based on this myth. I wouldn't be surprised this was just an attempt to give it one more heart beat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the argument that is often made is that we have discovered so little of our oceans that it’s possible we haven’t seen all the different aquatic species there are. Not suggesting Nessie is real, just the overall thought process I feel the believers use.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure but Loch Ness is on the 3rd most populated island in the world, it's comprehensively explored, there's nothing newsworthy to say about it unless there was a vast oversight and that would be the head line, not the "monster".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Also, the loch is only like 10,000 years old, so any 'monster' would have to be from the ocean.

There are sighting of sturgeon and other large fish that wandered into the loch which are likely candidates for misidentification.