this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
981 points (98.8% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

3938 readers
2 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I went to a church when I was a kid that taught that wine was completely non-alcoholic in biblical times.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remarkable how ignorant of their own bible the teetotalling Christians are. Without refrigeration grape juice becomes unsafe to drink quickly. Fermenting it was the only way it would keep. Also in 1 Tim 3:8 mentions to not have men as deacons if they're "addicted to much wine", clearly showing this was not grape juice they're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's even more directly stated, and specifically about the wine Jesus made. After he turned water into wine, the guests were specifically remarking that hosts generally feed their guests good wine early in the night and pull out cheaper wine after the guests are drunk and can't tell the difference... But in this case they saved the best for last.

This is great because it also is a counter point to the argument that some preachers say to the youth about it being DRUNKENNESS that god doesn't like.

Nope, not intrinsically, because Jesus lit up a party full of ALREADY drunk people with more booze.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well the Bible is clear that drunkenness is a sin. It's stated many times, old and new testament, and without a doubt it's a problem for a lot of people. But the wedding party wine is a good example that there's no issue with having a party and people drinking, and as you said, Jesus supplies more wine after they run out. He didn't feel the need to police everyone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I disagree that the bible is clear that it's a sin. It's murky at best.

There are many warnings of being drunk leading to other sins. I think it's implied that routine drunkenness inevitably at least leads to sloth. I think there is an important distinction between "getting drunk" and "being a drunkard".

It's pretty clear Paul wasn't a fan.

But like, Paul wasn't the Christ. Paul can hate all he wants but the fact remains that Jesus got a party full of people who were ALREADY drunk MORE DRUNK.

So, either Christ will himself tempt others into sin or it isn't a sin.

I think it's important to consider the position on temptation. If your hand causes you to sin, it's better to cut it off kinda thing. If getting drunk leads you to sin, you shouldn't get drunk.

In the same way that nobody in the bible or in the same realms of the living would suggest preemptively cutting off the hands and gouging out the eyes at birth to ensure no sins caused by those body parts, it's similarly reasonable to not take a same blanket preemptive stance on getting drunk.

I'd never stop someone from making a personal choice not to drink, for literally any reason. I'm pretty wary of anyone who says the bible is "clear" on what is and isn't a sin, though.

The definition of sin is the most boring and inconsequential part of the Christian faith and it's such a shame how many Christians are exclusively obsessed with it.

load more comments (3 replies)