this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Oakland

265 readers
4 users here now

About

A place to discuss all things Oakland

Rules

1- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.

2- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.

3- No NSFW content.

4- No Ads / Spamming.

Nearby Communities:

To contact the mod message the account on lemm.ee. I do not use the other account.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chais 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So people are billed based on an assignment of guilt made by a computer? Lovely. Absolutely no way that could go wrong.

/s

Don't get me wrong in theory that would be great. Reliably holding people causing delays in public transport responsible would be fantastic.
But I don't know if the percentage of people doing it out of negligence or ill will is high enough to justify such a measure. Some may be simply unaware, so better marking/signage may be sufficient. For some it may be beyond their control. I'm not convinced a machine learning system can achieve satisfying sensitivity and specificity in determining the actual culprit.
That's not even looking at the can of worms that the legal situation of such a system might be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That’s not even looking at the can of worms that the legal situation of such a system might be

Legally, each violation should be reviewed by a law enforcement officer before a citation is issued, much like a red-light-camera ticket.