this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
201 points (95.5% liked)

World News

32047 readers
913 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Justice Department filed a lawsuit today against Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX) for discriminating against asylees and refugees in hiring. The lawsuit alleges that, from at least September 2018 to May 2022, SpaceX routinely discouraged asylees and refugees from applying and refused to hire or consider them, because of their citizenship status, in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hang on, ain't it a federal law that if you are employed govt aerospace program (which spacex is part of cause its NASA funded contractor) that only American born people can work for them ? Came up in the past and they responded quoting that the Govt wont let them.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From the link:

In job postings and public statements over several years, SpaceX wrongly claimed that under federal regulations known as “export control laws,” SpaceX could hire only U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, sometimes referred to as “green card holders.” Export control laws impose no such hiring restrictions. Moreover, asylees’ and refugees’ permission to live and work in the United States does not expire, and they stand on equal footing with U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents under export control laws. Under these laws, companies like SpaceX can hire asylees and refugees for the same positions they would hire U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. And once hired, asylees and refugees can access export-controlled information and materials without additional government approval, just like U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So SpaceX blatantly lied hoping no-one else would notice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's most likely incompetence...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Lied or didn’t bother to fully read the law.