this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
3 points (54.3% liked)
PC Master Race
14226 readers
35 users here now
A community for PC Master Race.
Rules:
- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No NSFW content.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.
Notes:
- PCMR Community Name - Our Response and the Survey
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Nobara seems fine for fedora, but if you want to try Arch, then Garuda is for gaming use, I personally use EndeavourOS.
Linux is a trip of making one change and bricking your system, easily rolled back.
What changes does Garuda make that aren't good for general use?
His aim was gaming use, which is why I recommended Garuda for it.
With EndeavourOS you have to tinker a bit more with the OS to get everything compatible with gaming.
Is there a reason why Endeavour would not prefer those changes? Or is it just a matter of focus, resources, security?
I believe EndeavourOS aims to be as close to pure arch as they can be, while still making it a more user friendly experience.
Garuda is what you'd call "bloat", but for gaming it's useful bloat.