this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)

Melbourne

1830 readers
44 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Part of me is inclined to say might as well keep going with the games, but then I think sunk cost fallacy.

Does anyone even care about the commonwealth games?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Whether you like Dan or not I think this is the correct call. I believe Dan was counting on some federal funding to make this happen and that Albo probably pulled it in favour of a surplus.

So instead of spending the extra couple of billion, we would also need to spend the couple of billion we should have gotten federally and we got screwed instead.

On that though, I think Dan needs to appoint a successor and plan to retire.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whether you like Dan or not the original decision to sweep in like a hero and host the games was a reckless political play that's cost us dearly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

He committed to it how many years ago?

It's actually a great idea if it weren't for the financial crisis were in. It should have been an opportunity to bolster regional areas in a non sports rort way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Victorian Labor has a nasty habit of signing up for things they can’t afford, and then hoping the federal government foots the bill.

Also, this should really put into perspective how small the $5M settlement for COVID lockdown is in the scale of things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Im sure they actually discussed it beforehand, no hoping here.

And it was affordable until inflation and crippled building industry kicks in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No, they made assumptions about receiving funding from the federal government and local councils without receiving any commitments: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/victoria/victoria-banked-on-getting-200m-in-federal-funding-when-it-bid-for-games-20230820-p5dxyt.html

It was never going to be affordable given how much security would cost with it split across regional areas. It was always going to saddle the regional areas with the cost of maintaining sports facilities they’ll never fully utilise.