this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
43 points (87.7% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
389 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"This has become probably the most important both economic and political problem facing the country right now," said Tyler Meredith, a former head of economic strategy and planning for Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland.

"And especially given the significant emphasis the government has put on immigration and the relationship between immigration and the housing market, there is a need to do more."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trudeau doesn't give a flying shit about housing or the average Canadian. Atoms speak louder than words and time and time again the average Canadian is burned.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trudeau, like every head of a party in Canada, is governed by the old guard who hide in the back rooms but control what happen.

That is the shit I'm more pissed about ... that unelected rich white assholes tell the party leadership what they can do, and we pay for it.

[–] fresh 19 points 1 year ago

I’m really strongly against saying “both sides” or “all sides”. It’s not only factually incorrect but it breeds apathy. If you want things to change, you need to notice when the parties are trying to appeal to you.

In the last election, the NDP were the only ones to seriously bring up housing affordability. Singh said he thinks even current homeowners understand that people are suffering and are OK with lower prices, and the debate moderator grilled him for it. She “called him out” for supposedly hurting people who are relying on their home value as their retirement. I was shocked.

Meanwhile, the Liberals and Conservatives explicitly supported high home prices and “free market” solutions (except don’t mention zoning!). That makes sense given that they (especially the conservatives) get their voteshare from older homeowners.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

That's Neoliberalism for you. Which at this point is basically all the major parties. They all govern from the position that a free market is ideal, and regulation only happens when it "must", which requires a lot of proof, Rather than a more sensible system that assumes a market needs regulation to function, and demands proof before deregulation.

But we function on a ratchet & brake system. The Cons ratchet things better for the rich, the Libs hold the line while making performative actions that don't affect the fundamental power structure.

Shit sucks.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Atoms speak louder than words

Yes, but never trust an atom; they make up everything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

LOL exquisitely executed 👌

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

(☞゚ヮ゚)☞