this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

Melbourne

1862 readers
99 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Welcome to the Melbourne Community Daily Discussion Thread.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@wscholermann @bot001 well given the origins were for rich people (and the children of rich people) to do something with their spare time, it explains why quite a few degrees aren't much use. But they do help you understand why things are the way they are. Just tough titties if you don't have independent wealth to sustain you after you work this out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure universities were originally started by religious orders to be a place of learning. For them learning was a form of worship. This applies to both xian and Muslim universities.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Seagoon_ there seems to be conflicting information online but most universities seem to exist separate to religious orders, despite historically being very heavily influenced by them at times.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

the origin of universities per se, I'm talking 1000 years ago

But each university that exists today was founded for a unique reason

but to call universities places where rich people could do hobbies is insulting to both universities and to scholars and scientists.

For example, Darwin was a gentleman scientist. It wasn't just something he did in his spare time. It was his vocation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Seagoon_ yes, but he could only afford science to become a vocation because he was the son of a wealthy financier.

"The world's first university, The University of Al Qarawiynn, was founded in 895 CE by a woman named Fatima al-Fihri. She used her inheritance to form a large mosque with an associated school"

... so the world's first university apparently started by a woman of leisure who assumedly had a hefty inheritance if she could afford to start a University.

Even Siddhartha Gautama was a nobleman.

The luxury to spend time thinking and learning has traditionally been afforded to the wealthy, not the working class, and so when young folks now go to uni and feel like it was a scam, it's worth noting this history.