this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
94 points (80.1% liked)

Android

17244 readers
395 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: [email protected]


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: [email protected]

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: [email protected]

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to [email protected].

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to [email protected].

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (39 children)

I can't stand this guy anymore. Anyone got a TLDR so I can skip giving him a view?

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)

AI summary cause I can't be bothered either lmao

The video reviews the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 folding phone. While initially skeptical that it was just a minor upgrade, the reviewer found that the Z Flip 5 has some notable improvements over the previous model, especially the new Snapdragon chip and a simplified hinge that folds completely flat. The biggest change, however, is the much larger external screen, which allows for more notification management and app usage without opening the phone. Though not perfect, the reviewer concludes that the Z Flip 5 is currently the best folding phone overall, praising its performance, design refinements, and reasonable price point for those interested in foldable devices.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn, I had to watch the video to compare with the review (I'm very skeptical of anything AI), and this is right on point

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I knew it was right without watching the video as his videos, especially phone reviews are all about the same and sound like that.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not a long time ago i found a webpages where you put a youtube vid and you get a summary of it. I mean it's not that hard, ytdl download the subtitle, give it to AI for summary and voilΓ  ! Don't need to waste 20 minutes of your life for what can be summerized in 10 lines. I'll probably try making a bot for lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh wow, you sent me down a rabbit hole! That's a great tool. Then I realized it requires an account, as it is a paid service. And their main service is a search engine, which seems really interesting so far (you get 100 searches free). Love the customization options! What's your experience with the result quality? Not a huge fan of having to 0ay by search once beyond a threshold, but if the service is good...Google got super annoying with all the ads. But there's still companies like Duckduckgo that offer great search as well.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

There is YouTubetranscript so you can skim the words of the video. Useful for vague videos with click bait titles.

https://youtubetranscript.com/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is there a specific extension you recommend for Firefox? (for the AI summaries)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I just use the one that comes with my search engine, Kagi. They do have a FF extension https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/kagi-search-for-firefox/.

But I don't know of any dedicated one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hate that I've used chatGPT so much I can instantly recognize when something was generated by it lmao

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This isn't generated by chatGPT actually. I'm using the kagi universal summarizer which uses their own models.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well all bots sound the same

kill it with fire!

(if skynet is reading this in the future, this was written as a joke)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Once bots are teaching the next generation of people it'll be harder to tell the difference. Muhahaha

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh gods this will be a timesaver for those rambly videos that should've been a text article but somehow isn't.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So much for schools and their expensive AI detecting programs which don't work.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the funny thing. Once you use it so much you can instantly recognize when something was generated by it based on its frequent usage of certain words or formats. Dunno why I'm being downvoted for that. It's true.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Humans may be made irrelevant in places, but you can't say they're bad at (broadly) recognizing patterns

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't stand him either anymore. The production quality is high but the content feels very low effort and subjective. I especially cannot stand the zoom in thing as if he's saying something impactful or profound. What's worse is many of the similar channels are adopting it.

I guess that's the life cycle of a YouTube channel: Quirky and interesting -> gain traction -> adapt content for wider audiences to maintain growth -> become bland and lose the thing that was interesting to begin with

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When he started his channel, phones were out on a monthly basis with revolutionary tech each time.

The smartphone tech has more or less reached a plateau. I think he's trying to stay the same, but the products he reviews are less interesting

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're right, there is just not that much to be said about the 15th iPhone release we have seen year after year. And he has been branching out with the car videos and checking out other tech every now and then.

I wouldn't even mind the different subject, as you said phones are just not as interesting as they used to be. But these videos are very surface level, basically just watch him read the product page for a cool expensive thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not subscribed to anymore phone youtubers anymore for probably that reason. At the height of Android youtube I was subscribed to MKBHD when the tech was fresh exciting, and then subscribed to people doing custom roms or app recommendations.

But, now days when it comes to tech youtubers I prefer ones that at least go through the motions of seeming like they are being objective like Gamers Nexus or Hardware Unboxed or Digital Foundry by putting on a show of testing different configurations and so on. Lot of other tech youtubers just feel more like adverts lot of times with how shallow the presentation is, so whether product is recommended or not feels more like the purpose is to just get the brand out to viewers.

Which becomes really noticeable when they cover a product that you do actually use and watch their review on, and see how much stuff they glossed over with really the main highlight being nice cinematography. Videos aren't even straight to the point and short either, which is really part of why I stopped watching lot of them. If they at least were more straightforward and brief 2-3 minute overviews it'd be fine, but now they all push 10 minutes and over so waste your time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, I've always found smaller youtubers doing better

maybe its because smaller ones are more genuine as they are not doing this for money meanwhile largeer ones who have this as their defacto job always have the same narrative, I mean a mkbhd video, mrmobile video sound basically the same they don't talk about long term use of a phone and always give impressions

the only review they have made is mkbhd on why I don't use pixel anymore and mrmobile on his z fold experience

everything else is impressions with cool shots which gains views and gets them a preview unit from companies weeks before embargo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Random people holding a camera with one hand while awkwardly trying to record them going through their phone with the other hand has been more useful lot of times for answering questions I had.

load more comments (37 replies)