this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
6 points (68.8% liked)

Polyamory

650 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion of Polyamory as well as other Ethical Non-Monogamy styles.

Simple rules:

  1. Discussions around Polyamory specifically, or Ethical Non-Monogamy in general only.
  2. Don't be a dick.
  3. NSFW content is allowed in discussion (i.e. talking about sex is fine) but pornographic images are not.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

non youtube link

I posted this because I liked the open nature of the video, that it includes opinions from different perspectives and because I enjoy Mainely Mandys content.

My personal take: I see no reason to police someones queer identity, so if someone says they are queer then they are queer to me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My personal take is that cishet people are not queer just for being poly. I’ve seen many claim it, but time and time again they’re uncomfortable with all that comes with queerness

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they’re uncomfortable with all that comes with queerness

I cant really grasp what you mean by that. I would love to hear go into more detail what you mean with that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They often refuse to acknowledge the fact that opposite gender relationships are privileged even within nonmonogamy. They don’t learn the community culture. I’ve seen several instances of them expecting queer organization to do the labor for them instead of with them. I’ve got plenty of experiences of them asking to be part of the community, but that alone shows a failure of understanding of what the community even is. Sylvia Rivera did not ask for the T to be included, she screamed that trans people have already fought and bled alongside cis gay people. They don’t seek refuge in unaligned queer spaces en masse. When the rainbow flag is flying they don’t act like “this is my people”.

But I guess the biggest thing is, they aren’t marginalized in the same way that the umbrella is. A straight trans person is still a f@g to a bigot. A man with two girlfriends and no attraction to men isn’t, he’s a player or a cheater or something else in that vein. A woman with a wife is degendered by bigots, a woman with three husbands isn’t, even if they’re all married to each other too, she’s a slut. My monogamous lesbian friends feel fundamentally not in community and collaboration with cishet poly people, and I can tell the feeling is mutual. Both groups are allied to each other but it’s not even like it is with leather where they know the leather folk will throw down alongside. The queer community really is at its core “we’re similar enough to get mistaken for each other by bigots”. Like how the main secondary targets of transmisogyny are cis lesbians.

This isn’t exclusion for exclusion’s sake but rather a statement of the fact that I see mononormativity as fundamentally a different form of oppression to cisheteronormativity. And because of that, even solely from my perspective as a polyamorous person, I think that inclusion of polyamory into the lgbt umbrella wouldn’t help as much as it hurts. Movement focusing on polyamory will likely do more good on its own separate but in solidarity. It won’t take a backseat that way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

If it was a requirement for a given group to count as queer that all of the members of the group must be comfortable with all the things that comes with queerness, then I don't think any group would qualify as queer.

For example lesbians would not qualify as queer on account of transphobic lesbians existing.