this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
28 points (100.0% liked)
Formula 1
9070 readers
103 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 United States | 21-23 Nov |
| 🇶🇦 Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
| 🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The issue here is under the current regulations they can't catch up. They will be behind forever in their facilities and that's not good for the sport.
The cost cap in F1 is very new and still needs adjustments. Providing teams that fell behind in facilities a better option to catch up is needed.
The reason the current approach failed was because they were looking for a one-time exemption rather than a proper rule overhaul.
I assume we will see something similar to car development where teams that placed lower in the construction championship will have a higher budget for facilities available. But how exactly this should look like is difficult.
I wonder if they could take the average cap ex of say Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull over the past 10 years and then work out on a team by team basis how much cap ex allowance over the next X years they're allowed to spend too reach that. So Williams might get the biggest allowance, followed by Haas and Sauber, but teams like McLaren and Aston might not get anywhere near as much. That would obviously be on top of whatever the base expenditure is now.
I know jack shit about finance though so this is probably way off base!
The cost cap was implemented to maintain the status quo. That's the only way the big teams would agree to it.