this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
136 points (94.2% liked)

Asklemmy

45249 readers
902 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What opinion just makes you look like you aged 30 years

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (18 children)

Containerization seems overrated. I haven't really played with it much, but as far as I can tell, the way it's most commonly used is just static linking with extra steps and extra performance overhead. I can think of situations where containers would actually be useful, like running continuous integration builds for someone you don't entirely trust, but for just deploying a plain old application on a plain old server, I don't see the point of wrapping it in a container.

Mac OS 7 looked cool. So did Windows 95.

Phones are useful, but they're not a replacement for a PC.

I don't want to run everything in a web browser. Using a browser engine as a user interface (e.g. Electron) is fine, but don't make me log in to some web service just to make a blasted spreadsheet.

I want to store my files on my computer, not someone else's.

I don't like laptops. I'd much rather have a roomy PC case so I can easily open it up and change the components if I want. Easier to clean, too.

[โ€“] Hagarashi8 1 points 2 years ago (17 children)
  1. Idea is that you can have different apps that require different versions of dependency X, and that could stop you with traditional package managment, but would be OK with containers
  2. Haven't seen macOS 7,but 100% agree on Windows 95. 2000 is better though.
  3. Still can't believe someone actually believe they are
  4. 100% agree
  5. Sometimes you just have 1 hour free, and that's not enough to go home, but too big to just kill it. That's when laptop is great. Also, sometimes going outside and do stuff feels better than doing it at home.
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[โ€“] Hagarashi8 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, i agree, it looks awesome.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Also see Mac OS 8, which added a shaded-gray look not unlike Windows 95, and Mac OS 9, the last version of the classic Mac OS. These versions have a lot more features than the older version 7, but they also take much longer to bootโ€”so long that Apple added a progress bar to the boot screen!

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)