this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
53 points (96.5% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1274 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

[email protected]


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Scientists do have an open mind. However it is only open to things that don't contradict existing experimental results. Relativity stands up well to experiments, so anything that replaces it will still be very similar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And how does a “really powerful rocket” counteract experimental results?

All you need for interstellar travel without breakthroughs in physics is the ability to sustain a self contained ecosystem in your craft.

Humanity already has plans to send probes to Alpha Centauri, and the only technological price of that puzzle that’s missing is thinner solar sail material.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That is a close system. The universe is big. Odds are no alien lives close enough for solar sails to get here in the lifetime of the universe or galaxy.