Australia

3507 readers

78 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
Politics, post it to Australian Politics
World News/Events, post it to World News
A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Australia will fall well short of 82 per cent renewable energy by 2030, analysts predict, as problems mount (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Plans by the federal government for Australia to generate more than four-fifths of its power from renewable sources by 2030 are coming under pressure amid claims the country is way off track.

Key points:

There are increasing suggestions Australia will fall short of its 2030 renewable power target of 82 per cent
Analysts predict Australia's share of renewable energy is on track to be about 60 per cent at the current rate of progress
The forecasts come amid mounting opposition to projects such as transmission lines in some parts of Australia

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It depends.

Up in Canada where I live, we tried that experiment with respect to solar, and it is a failed experiment. You can build a one gigawatt solar farm, and for the most part it's going to be getting a trivial percentage of nameplate capacity basically all the time. Check the ieso and you'll see that fact manifest. Wind does ok, hydroelectric works great, solar doesn't make any sense in places without much sun.