this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1494 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

70995 readers
5885 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Security can mean security against hackers, but it can also mean security against revealing classified information. Classified information about weapons systems (e.g. performance characteristics) is inherently embedded into the code running on those systems, and therefore shouldn't be open sourced.

Source: used to write classified code

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

A lot of functionality can be decoupled from anything that needs to be classified. A HUD is a HUD and no one should be hard coding in performance characteristics of the F-35 into it. I've also worked on government projects and holy crap does the code quality vary wildly, even before you get into "it's still working so deal with the problems, it doesn't have the budget for updates".

Using 'off the shelf' parts/code can save significant time and money. There's a reason subs use xbox controllers. Government websites and data interfaces at the very least should have the audit-ability that open source provides.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

A HUD is a HUD

sure but the HUD from the F-35 is very specifically designed to work in an F-35. It's very similar, and comes from the same family, as the software running on other planes. But it's not identical.

And yes, performance limits would be hard coded into the software because the HUD needs to alert the pilot when they are getting close.

Edit: and that's ignoring the fact that a lot of this stuff comes from private companies so you'll run into things like IP/patent laws

[–] ricecake -1 points 3 days ago

If it's developed for the government, even by a private contractor, it's still considered US government code and is public domain. It's why sqlite is public domain.

I personally doubt there's much available in the off-the-shelf fighter HUD system market, personally.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)