this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
686 points (76.3% liked)

memes

10482 readers
1833 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It shuts down discussion that could sway people reading the discussion by not explaining why it is true and also shutting down anyone else trying to explain. I see it most frequently used by people who had a discussion sometime in the past and don't seem to understand that not everyone was there at the time.

Like I agree that a woman is the only one who should decide if she should terminate a pregnancy, but when that is the response any time someone asks why there is no opportunity for someone to explain why that is true for people who haven't ever had it explained to them. They don't have to explain, but they also don't need to shut down discussion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody is obligated to explain repeatedly the same point to every lazy idiot who can bother to STFW before asking a question. And then you have sealions and people JAQing off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They are not obligated to explain, but they are not correct for saying that nobody else can.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd just say that existing good explanations elsewhere (and perfectly searchable ones at that), they shouldn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, do your own research is a great way for uninformed people to find the right information.

No individual is required to do anything, but someone linking to a good explanation shouldn't be discouraged.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No individual is required to do anything, but someone linking to a good explanation shouldn’t be discouraged.

Your position seemed to be that every time a person ask a question, somebody should answer the question or provide the link even if the person hasn't bother to do any research first.

"How to ask questions the smart way" was written for a reason.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

It would be great if you replied to what I said instead of what you assume I mean.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, "they" don't need to shut it down, but "they" might want to and that's OK. If we're talking about forum mods, they might use their judgement to decide they don't want their platform to be a space for debating something that threatens the safety of their users.

You want to make your own forum where anyone can debate anything, then absolutely go right ahead. Doesn't mean somebody else can't make a forum they refuse to allow debate on certain issues.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are not talking about forum mods.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste 1 points 1 year ago

Okay, so what are we talking about? Who are "they" in your comments?