this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

736 readers
347 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body. More info

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Tuesday to hear a Native American group's bid based on religious rights to block Rio Tinto (RIO.AX), opens new tab and BHP (BHP.AX), opens new tab from gaining control of Arizona land needed to build one of the world's largest copper mines - a project situated on land long used for Apache sacred rituals.

The project is 55% owned by British-Australian mining company Rio Tinto and 45% by Australian mining company BHP. Rio Tinto is the project's operator. Both companies have spent more than $2 billion on the project without yet producing any copper.

Conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented, with Gorsuch calling the court's decision a "grave mistake" that would allow the government to destroy the Apaches' sacred site without even at least hearing arguments in their case.

"Just imagine if the government sought to demolish a historic cathedral on so questionable a chain of legal reasoning," Gorsuch said. "I have no doubt that we would find that case worth our time."

The destruction of the sacred site also would violate a 1852 treaty promising that the U.S. government would protect the land and "secure the permanent prosperity and happiness" of the Native American tribe, the plaintiffs said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Curious to see the conservative judges speaking out against this. I would have assumed they'd enjoy the opportunity to tell the Native Americans to kick sand. I wonder what precedent they were hoping to set with this case.

[–] pelespirit 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can't tell if it's a misprint on what happened or what. It's a puzzle to me too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gorsuch has a very pro-native bent, Thomas on the other hand, has me stumped.

[–] Jiggle_Physics 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, helping protect, and expand, native land ownership, and autonomy, has been a life long passion work for Gorsuch. With Trump, this time, and last, he has basically seen his life's work get torpedoed. Guess he figured as a USSC judge he was above the leopards who could eat his face. His face has been eaten.

load more comments (1 replies)