this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
127 points (81.0% liked)
Voyager
5481 readers
146 users here now
The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.
Rules
- Be nice.
- lemmy.world instance policy
Sponsor development! π
π
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Haven't tried it but I just decided to put a recurring donation for aeharding on Github, Sync for Lemmy's tracking-infused ad model and the pricing for the ad-free versions just convinced me that we need to support open-source devs even more.
I find it sad that lots of people seem to be excited to pay $20 for a closed-source app but very few supported the devs that have been developing the apps that carried us on their backs until now for free.
Voyager has only 22 sponsors right now and hasn't even reached his $250/month goal on Github, while Sync for Lemmy is already asking for $100 for a OTP for the Ultra version.
EDIT: aeharding also just added a Liberapay in the sidebar!
Hey, thanks for sponsoring! π
People have a certain familiarity with Sync. I would pay $20 if "Relay for Reddit" were ported over. The other apps just lack a ton of polish unfortunately. Liftoff is the closest to being what I want (besides Sync).
Even still, I don't understand the backlash against the Sync dev charging for his work. If he's successful, others may see a viable path forward and follow him. We should WANT a variety of quality Lemmy clients out there for users. A good experience is how you gain/retain users. I'm also all for open source options for users. Users should have a choice.
It's not charging people have issue with, but the initial subscription model approach to ads it took.
It might have worked for Reddit with its api calls they were charging for and the space of reddit generally being full on monetization of its users, but for something related to the fediverse it was off putting. And I think people here are more adverse to ads even being present in an app than paying.
Approach to subscription requests I've found best has been Christians approach with Apollo of having no ads but less features on the free version like limits to filters, no multiple account logins, and no submissions.
Submissions is a shit thing to paywall imo
Maybe, but I do greatly prefer limited features to push users towards the paid option over the ad model.
Can you post a link for the donation for Voyager
https://github.com/sponsors/aeharding/
Do you think you could add a donate button in the app like Apollo used to? So I can give using my Apple account.
Iβm not the dev but my general feeling is that he doesnβt want to do anything like this. He seems to kind of dodge questions about payment or supporting him more. Which is a shame, cause Iβd love to see more people contribute
you have a "sponsors" button in the sidebar of this community π
TIL I can give people money on github, also didn't realise I already have github account so that made it easy
I think this boils down to two reasons:
I hope this post didn't come of as a bit to dark, my view points especially on the community/developer relationship in a donation/sponsor context versus subscription context could be way off.
Curious on your thoughts (love the work on voyager π )
Edit Just wanted to link photoprism (a opensource ai powered photos app) subscription policy (I think it does put a interesting case on subscriptions versus donations).
https://www.photoprism.app/membership/faq
Pricing (not sponsoring them or anything just as a point of reference):
https://www.photoprism.app/editions
How do you do this? How do you sponsor? I would love to sponsor aeharding
There's a GitHub "sponsors" button in the sidebar. He also added a Liberapay link if you prefer it over GitHub.
Where is the librepay optionΒΏ?
in the sidebar of this community π
Thanks I am a bone head. Well I will try to contribute my part then. Tried through GitHub but the payment/transfer was not getting processed.