Linux

52622 readers

579 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

134

What's with the move to MIT over AGPL for utilities? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

132 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I would understand if Canonical want a new cow to milk, but why are developers even agreeing to this? Are they out of their minds?? Do they actually want companies to steal their code? Or is this some reverse-uno move I don't see yet? I cannot fathom any FOSS project not using the AGPL anymore. It's like they're painting their faces with "here, take my stuff and don't contribute anything back, that's totally fine"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I assume this is in reference to the rust coreutils being MIT-licensed. How would using GPL benefit them?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Improvements would be upstreamed. Not with MIT

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

GPL would not require that. It would only require publication of the source. There is no requirement to give back or even make your changes compatible with upstream.

[–] unhrpetby 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

True.

Though, you are probably going to have a much easier time implementing a change to your code that is present in a company's published code, than you would trying to reverse-engineer a binary.

Sharing of the code I would consider "giving back" in it of itself.

load more comments (1 replies)