this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
976 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
3953 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source Link Privacy.Privacy test result

https://themarkup.org/blacklight?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tarlogic.com%2Fnews%2Fbackdoor-esp32-chip-infect-ot-devices%2F&device=mobile&location=us-ca&force=false

Tarlogic Security has detected a backdoor in the ESP32, a microcontroller that enables WiFi and Bluetooth connection and is present in millions of mass-market IoT devices. Exploitation of this backdoor would allow hostile actors to conduct impersonation attacks and permanently infect sensitive devices such as mobile phones, computers, smart locks or medical equipment by bypassing code audit controls.

Update: The ESP32 "backdoor" that wasn't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The Chinese adding back doors into their software/hardware.

Say it ain't so!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It ain't so.

To use the "backdoor" an attacker needs to have full access to the esp32 powered device already.

It's like claiming that being able to leave your desk without locking your PC is a backdoor in your OS.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, this is about undocumented instructions found in the silicon but they are not executable unless the ESP32's firmware uses them. Firmware cannot be edited to use them unless you have an existing vulnerability such as physical access or insecure OTA in existing firmware (as far as researchers know).

It is good to question the "backdoor" allegations - maybe the instructions' microcode was buggy and they didn't want to release it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Say it ain't so
Your bug is a heartbleeder
Say it ain't so
My NIC is a bytetaker

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

tech backdoors are only okay when us good guys require em

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

China ain't our friend but neither is our own regime, I don't get the normies only caring about privacy and security when chinaman do the thing

Then they tuck their dicks because they got nothing to hide when domestic spook is doing the same

pathetic and intellectually disingenuous

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where did anyone say anything remotely like that?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldnt be so sure about that. I've heard people say stuff that was mindbogglingly dumber than that, completely seriously.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

thats what /s is for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

How about all tech backdoors are bad and we should aim to use and make software and hardware that is ethically produced and usable without selling out your privacy and security?

[–] turnip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like a PRISM for China, is every powerful country just backdooring each other?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago