this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)
Bicycles
3138 readers
30 users here now
Welcome to [email protected]
A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!
Community Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
-
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn.
-
No ads / spamming.
-
Ride bikes
Other cycling-related communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Have you tried over 130 without padded shorts? I find that if my saddle fits, padded shorts are going to affect that and may add rubbing or pressure in areas that your ass isn't used to especially if you normally ride without.
I don't ride anywhere near your level but I've ridden 160 without padding and was fine because my saddle is comfortable normally.
No, but not because of comfort. I find that regular shorts or just non-padded lycra causes me to sweat through them to the point where it looks like I've pissed my pants in less than an hour of riding. Padded shorts give me some buffer before moisture can be seen through them.*
If I were to guess, I've probably done my regular 60 - 80km rides without padded shorts at a reasonably comfortable level (I honestly don't even remember).
On this bike, without padded shorts and with several other saddles than the one I'm using now (Brooks C17 carved), it gets uncomfortable much sooner.
Sounds like a good thing to try. Good luck!