this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
71 points (91.8% liked)

Canada

7241 readers
182 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the article makes it look like it’s evil not to allow promoters to replace single-family houses by massive skyscrapers of 12+ units on a land that is surrounded by single family homes

That's because it is.

There's a housing crisis on. When my kids grow up they're going to either live in my basement, their cars, or Texas. I don't care about you wanting to carve out the bottom of Maslow's hierarchy of needs to decorate the top.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's challenging... I've seen hostile promoters creating undesirable "condos" just to squeeze out as much profit as they can from a lot, for example by removing all the greenspace and putting parking lots.

How do you propose to manage preservation/improvement of green cities when promoters try to cram as many units as possible in a tiny land?

I want to increase housing density, but not by forcing everyone to live in "Judge Dredd" tenements everywhere...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's worth looking into why they cram so many units in. In my opinion, because there's so little room to build any kind of density, where it is allowed, developers feel the need to maximize their space budget to cater to the segment of the population that really does want the smaller place.

If we had more flexibility, we could have a wider range of places, rather than just giant mansion houses and small tenements. The law doesn't allow for much else.