this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
60 points (81.9% liked)

Technology

63614 readers
3782 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This does not look real. I can’t put my finger as to why. It looks like good CGI but the lighting off the robot does not feel perfect.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was curious why someone downvoted you, so I took a look at the video.

That is absolutely 100% CGI and I’m not sure why anyone is doubting that. I’m on mobile and I can still see it.

Take my upvote.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The biggest tell is at 0:21.

You see the badge flying around as a physics object and then, when the animation stops the left side part of the necklace "resets" and slides up on the bots neck despite that being like a ball suddenly deciding to go from a rest to rolling up hill.

It looks like it went from being rendered as a physics object to slowing down enough that it returned to being a regular object attached to the model's rigging .

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I don't see the movement with the badge you're describing, can you screenshot it for me? It looks normal to my untrained eye and I'd like to get better at spotting fakes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

The badge, the soft landings, and the seams in the concrete blipping in and out were the biggest factors for me.

Edit for downvoter: Watch nothing but the concrete for the whole video. I think the badge moved too perfectly and the landings didn’t seem to reflect physics, but the jitter on the concrete rendering is beyond unrealistic.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh, yeah, that really does not look real. Like on its own this seems unlikely since there's been no talk about this until now, but wow that video just looks really, really fake.

Also it's apparently only ~4ft/130cm tall, which would make this less impressive even if all the promo media released about it is real, which seems... unlikely.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Let‘s give them the benefit of doubt. I mean this would only be the millionth time they get caught blatantly faking footage of exactly this technology and make wrong claims. Surely they have learned by now. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Can I have the source claiming they've faked footage? I would love to have that and didn't find anything on google, hoping for a captain disillusion situation!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you watch other videos from trade shows they show incredibly limited movement and jerky balance.

Nowhere close to the same league as in the video.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

/s stands for sarcasm. Of course it‘s fake. It always is.