this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
27 points (84.6% liked)

World News

33519 readers
491 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I'm well aware of his work and the impact it has had (although a bunch of it has been overblown). It makes no difference to how valid his point is. What's more his credentials lend him great credibility among those who still believe in the dogma of liberalism, and make it undeniable that if a highly accomplished working economist, shares the opinions of many Marxist analysts then delusional libs should probably listen for a change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

ok you have a good point

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

His perspective on war isn't Marxist. Economics thinking, doesn't put a lot of weight on irrational hatred as a basis for happiness.

It's not only mean and unfair, it's unprofitable to make a war on Russia.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I never said it was. I just said he's liberal economist who has come to some of the same conclusions as Marxists, obviously because of different motivations.