684
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
684 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
64937 readers
4026 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For any skeezy technology, ask:
Does it have legitimate uses?
Would stopping it cause more problems than it solves?
People can fret about pornogrifying real people, but Photoshop already had this debate, and Photoshop kinda has to use real photos of real people. This software defaults to making shit up. Its output, however vulgar, doesn't need to look like any actual person. Even depicting acts that are extremely illegal is just a machine fantasy matching demonstrable labels. The only possible way to prevent that from including bad things would be to destroy this technology in its entirety, and that simply will not happen.
So stop fretting. You don't need a perfectly virtuous take on a do-anything program that can emit smut. There will be no version that somehow recognizes your coworkers and refuses to work with that. Nor will Photoshop treat a celebrity's copy-pasted face like a Eurion constellation. A network that can show you a spinning hot dog on the moon can obviously also show tits, because there's more examples of mundane tits than rotating moon dogs.
Empowering people to do science fiction shit with their computers includes bad things. That's what most science fiction is about! We have to deal with that, the same way we have to deal with people being capable of bad things using e-mail and motor vehicles and pointy sticks. You make a reasonable effort to stop people doing bad things accidentally - and if they do it anyway, you hit them.
This stupid gimmick is how we let everyone become a movie maker.
Whatever it's good at, with trivial input, we'll all recognize and become inured to. Like how Terragan was jawdropping until you saw the dozenth barren landscape. People will use this tech to tell stories, because humans can't help using things to tell stories. We'll get shows starring actors who don't exist, and judge them viciously among a sea of viewing options, even knowing the whole thing was produced by A Guy. That solitary authorship will allow things that weren't possible when they needed a budget and a crew. That will include bad things. But I'm less worried about seeing my actual face plastered onto generic gross hallucinations, than I am about missing a reality where everyone can make their dream project real.