this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
23 points (92.6% liked)

MapleResistance

82 readers
8 users here now

For discussion of contingency planning and non-violent resistance to the sudden emergent imperialism. See also: [email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 

What products are most at risk. What are easiest to replace to reduce risk? Hardest to replace?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In a invasion we don't have to think about software kill switches, each tower can be trivially destroyed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I suppose I was presuming they wanted the infrastructure intact. Probably easier to shut off the power than to destroy the dam. But this all presumes they're acting rationally. Invading Canada isn't rational, so everything else is a question mark too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Cell phone towers are not critical infrastructure, destroying them is just the cost of war.

Hydroelectric dams, nuclear power plants, anything that takes a long time to build, would be spared if the intent is to takeover.

Off the cuff invasion scenario:

  1. Jam all gps
  2. Multistike all air force and anti air installations
  3. Emp over military facilities
  4. Destroy key communication points
  5. Destroy power grid
  6. Mine all major roads (cluster mines from the air)
  7. Secure /disable nuclear assets

Cut the population off so they can't organize, destroy the military, secure critical assets. Since most of the CA population lives within 100km of the boarder the only real pernicious worry will be submarines deployed and further afield military posts in the north.