this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)
Open Source
33213 readers
136 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I edited several videos for work precisely 2-5 years ago and it was really good. That surprised me in the good sense because last time I tried it before that was like in 2010 and was rather funky, but so was my crappy laptop. And there's been a while since that and since KDE brought it to attention and the fundraising and you name it and it seems it has improven even more. Maybe with time it can be another famous representative from KDE targeted towards content creation as now it is Krita.
That being said, I just can't take any "review" from a "normie" about FOSS stuff seriously because most of the time they come from a propietary software mindset.
Take for example reviews about Inkscape or GIMP and you'll find most of them mentioning "they're not as usable as Photoshop/Illustrator". So people expect any alternative to work exactly as their non-foss counterpart, which is absolutely ridiculous.
I'd say there's nothing ridiculous in expecting FOSS thing to be as good as non FOSS, both are made by human after all, yes more work is done by paid developers than by enthusiasts, but there's nothing impossible about FOSS software being as good as non FOSS.
What's ridiculous is that people expect one software to behave the same as other software when the FOSS software does not imply in any way that it is a clone of a proprietary software and that it strives to behave the same way / be a direct replacemen. Like, yes, Inkscape is a great vector editor, but noone says it's an Illustrator clone. You can ditch Illustrator and use Inkscape, but it isn't a direct replacement, stuff will be different.
There are "free clones", like double Commander is a clone of Total Commander, and in this case it is valid to expect one to behave exactly like another.
Well, that was exactly my point.
Being usable does not imply being a clone.