this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
621 points (99.4% liked)

PC Master Race

15561 readers
3 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's fascinating to me that people prefer shitty nagware over 7-zip only because they think they're "getting one over" by not paying for inferior software and/or feel nostalgic for it.

[–] admin 3 points 1 week ago

I feel nostalgic for WinRAR and I don't need or want the fucking bag. Fucking.rar was the first file extension I remember learning at like 6yo that wasn't something dumb like .txt .jpg .doc .ppt .exe

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I bought it because 7-zip was shit back then so yeah ill stick with WinRar

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I hate having to find my key when I get a new computer. I know there are alternatives but I paid for it, I want it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

For a good while, the UI in 7-Zip was so atrocious merely extracting an existing archive was not obvious. It definitely improved over that.

I'd argue that even today, WinRAR UI is more intuitive than 7-Zip, but it is largely irrelevant since both have decent integration with windows file explorer anyway, which was also something 7-Zip lacked for a while.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Probably 10-15 years ago or something