this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

1495 readers
1 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I will never understand why how much a company spends on their products is considered newsworthy. Blows my mind.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I think people kind of just like laughing at how ridiculous Star Citizen is, and kind of rightly so. Over half a billion dollars and a decade in development just for what they've got is pretty wild.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

To be clear, what they've got right now with sharded persistance and asset streaming is extremely novel on a technical level, but there's no real substance to it yet as a game, just an impressive engine with an absurdly large scale and a tech demo running on it.

If they ever actually stop fiddling and make the damn game it'll be impressive, I'm sure, but so will the earthshattering cost and scale of waste getting there. Then 2 years later someone else will put out something 90% as impressive for 1/100th the cost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ya, I agree that what they have is promising. I really do hope they can finish the game as I'm really excited by the ideas they have.

People like to call the game a scam, but they've actually delivered something tangible. I personally don't think I'd enjoy the game in it's current state (and it kind of shocks me the amount of money people have put into Star Citizen), but the fundamentals seem to be there for a real game. They just have to "finish the owl," so to speak.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)