this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
442 points (98.3% liked)

NonCredibleDiplomacy

234 readers
8 users here now

Shitposting about geopolitics, diplomacy, and current events for shits and giggles

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
442
Tariffs (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/noncrediblediplomacy
 

(This is a parody for all who were unawere)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] liyunxiao 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The courts aren't the check in the case we're talking about, the jury is.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Im talking about SCOTUS and the federal courts. Those Courts are the check on the executive branch. The executive branch is not the check on itself.

Even if we were talking about a jury that would still ge part of the courts

[–] liyunxiao 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Neither scotus nor the federal courts can bring charges, only oversee trials for said charges, or in the case of scotus, determine whether laws are constitutional and were followed during trial.*

Therefore the executive, as has always been it's role would have to bring charges.

  • Obviously courts can bring contempt charges, but only during and after a trial.