this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1580 readers
525 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's wild that Yudkowsky saw a binary choice of "nuclear holocaust" and "superintelligence" and chose "nuclear holocaust" in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like, even if I believed in FOOM, I'll take my chances with the stupid sexy basilisk 🐍 over radiation burns and it's not even fucking close.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't want to say with absolute confidence that there's no scenario I can imagine to which a nuclear apocalypse would be preferable (the real kind, not the Fallout kind). But I have yet to hear one.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The upcoming firestorms of climate change, while patrolling the Mohave desert almost make you wish for nuclear winter. Ow wait not like fallout you said

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

nuclear winter is not a thing that can possibly happen, from what i understand

sagan et al overstated amount of soot put in upper atmosphere over 10x, for no particular reason other than trying to make a point

notice how no one talked about it after desert storm? oilfield fires provided negative evidence

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago

They still do nuclear war climate modelling. Its still bad.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Another dream shattered. Not sure if the oilfield fires were big enough. Volcanoes can cause some cooling right? pokes old yeller

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

We’ve had recent eruptions in all be big categories, so we’re not due another one for a while and trying to cheat by setting one off early won’t allow sufficient pressure for a proper bang.

Not that I want to discourage you, but don’t be sad if you try for a year without summer and get a couple of weeks without flights instead.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago

yellowstone caldera erupting during Trump II would be fitting somehow