this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
93 points (96.0% liked)

Hardware

969 readers
64 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
93
Pebble rises from the grave: Google open sources PebbleOS and a the founder of Pebble is making a new watch - Liliputing (liliputing.com)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Same specs? Fuck that, pebble 2 came out in like 2018

Give us a better processor and month long battery life plz

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What kind of power computing do you want to do on a watch ? It'd be so wasteful to put super advanced chips in those, honesty a really bad mindset

[–] IrateAnteater 11 points 2 days ago

In this case "better" corresponds with "newer". With newer chips being on newer process nodes, they are likely to have better efficiency, giving the watch better battery life.