this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
87 points (89.9% liked)

Linux

46775 readers
1939 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Appimages, snaps and flatpaks, which one do you prefer and why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

None of the above. Native debs/rpms/whatever for desktops, docker images for servers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

but what about the apps that are not in the official repository?

for example tuba the mastodon client

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

package myself; I chose Gentoo (and previously Arch) in part because its reasonably easy to package things there.

Most build systems are covered by eclasses ( libraries) that handle the repetitive minutia every package that build system needs.

Here's the tuba ebuild for example (from GURU, the Gentoo equivalent of the AUR), 90% of it is just listing the dependencies and telling it to use a few eclasses to handle everything else.

Oh, and here's the lemmy back end ebuild, the giant wall of crates is automatically generated/updated from a tool that reads the cargo files. (needed because Gentoo doesn't allow internet access during the build for normal packages so crates are downloaded ahead of time)

[–] abrasiveteapot 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

aur is limited to arch based distros only

[–] abrasiveteapot 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

aur is limited to arch based distros only

And rpms are for redhat tree, so ?

OP said

None of the above. Native debs/rpms/whatever for desktops, docker images for servers.

Your example package is readily available in my distro in native was my point. If your distro doesn't have it then maybe you need to change distros.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Arch users being like "I have it in my AUR. What more could other people ask for ?"

You should realise it's a possibility not to want to change a system just to use (possibly broken) AUR

[–] abrasiveteapot 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which, again, misses the point. Original OP said "install native" replying OP said "but what about (package)" (obviously intending that to be a gotcha) and I replied with "well it's in mine"

I have no idea what debs& rpms are available, nor do i care.

And what is this "possibly broken aur" rubbish ? It's a repository, and it most certainly isn't broken.

Individual packages may be broken but they can be broken in any repository. Are you saying there's never been a broken package in a debian repository ? Lol.

Edit to correct "you" to "OP" as you aren't the original person doing the "whataboutism"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Do you check packages you install from the aur? I ask, because it seems like people don't. I did, and it was a pain in the ass, and that's why I stopped using arch and arch based distros.

[–] Steamymoomilk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The aur has now broke your system congrats

[–] abrasiveteapot 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nope, nothing broke but

Aborting... error: failed to build 'tuba-0.4.0-0.1':

and I can't be arsed troubleshooting why for a package I have no intention of using. LOL

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Basically this. Not saying the "AUR breaking your system" thing isn't, well, a thing but I get "error aborting installation" warnings waaaaay more often than my system just outright dying because of an AUR package (which is to say, it's never actually happened to me).

And usually, when I see that warning, I go "kay, not even gonna bother" because if I ignore it and try to brute force the install...yeah, that potential breakage is on me, not the AUR

[–] abrasiveteapot 2 points 1 year ago

Ditto. I've literally never had an aur package break my system either, but like you if it doesnt want to play first go, I'll almost always find an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Then a tgz that I unpack to /opt/ or somewhere in ~/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope you turn on DCT because docker image downloads are totally insecure by default.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's DCT? I'm not actually running Docker but Kubernetes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Docker Content Trust. Its the (off by default and pretty broken) way that docker would verify what it downloads wasn't maliciously modified