this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
139 points (90.2% liked)

Canada

7357 readers
446 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada should not respond to potential U.S. tariffs with retaliatory tariffs, as this would primarily harm Canadian consumers by driving up prices. Instead, Canada should leverage its industrial and technological capabilities to undermine the monopolistic rent-seeking of American corporations by legalizing and promoting third-party modifications, repairs, and alternative marketplaces for technology, agriculture, and other industries. By dismantling restrictive intellectual property laws—many of which were imposed under the USMCA trade agreement—Canada could become a global hub for jailbreaks, independent app stores, and right-to-repair solutions, thereby reducing dependence on U.S. tech monopolies and fostering a new high-tech economy that directly benefits Canadian consumers and businesses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk 59 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I agree in principle. Personally, I think Canada needs to pivot hard to being much closer to the EU. However, that approach will take too much time and bear out a lot of pain before we're done.

In the short term though, Trump is a bully so responding to tariffs with anything other than escalation is likely to attract more tariffs and economic damage.

[–] smuuthbrane 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I've actually been wondering if we shouldn't approach the EU for membership. It's probably a pretty hard sell from the EU side, but it would send a message about turning on one's closest ally.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean one of the requirments is being part of Europe. And yes the council determines what that means. But it we could be very hard to say Canada is part of Europe.

[–] smuuthbrane 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Europe is what Europe defines itself to be. Definitely a stretch to include Canada, but if we also keep a trade agreement with the rest of North America we could be a back door to European goods to sell into the USA.

Again, WILDLY unlikely.

[–] xmunk 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, our border isn't too far from Greenland!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In fact we have a land border.

[–] xmunk 2 points 18 hours ago

Oh right, that funky island where we trade whiskey for schnapps.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)