this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
121 points (98.4% liked)

Asklemmy

44417 readers
625 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (8 children)

a clock running backwards is moving away from the current time at twice the rate, so isn't your example the same as saying that a clock that runs twice as fast is right 4 times a day?

[โ€“] ryathal 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No, if you go twice as fast, it would only align with one at 12 and one at 24. It's not about speed, it's about the intersections of forward and backward laps.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can you give me some examples, for some reason I'm finding it hard to picture

[โ€“] ryathal 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can picture a clock or a track. If you have one going forward and one backwards, they meet at the halfway point (6), and again at the full lap (12). This happens twice in a day.

If you have one going twice as fast, they only meet when the faster one laps the slower one. The two clocks would be at 3&6, 6&12, 9&6(18), 12&12(24)

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

it is less than 4 times/day correct, if there is a speed difference between backward rotation and time.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Ah yeah, there it is - thanks for that example

load more comments (3 replies)