Politics
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only
▪️ Title must match the article headline
▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)
▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.
Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body.
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
view the rest of the comments
Even though most hospitals spend way too much on administration, I doubt that's really the reason they are 1-10 billion dollars in debt.
That's just because hospitals aren't very profitable, especially nowadays when they are competing with dozens of private clinics who only do specialty medicine.
Because of the lack of universal healthcare running emergency medicine departments have become giant money holes. Where all the other departments in the hospitals only real goal is to make enough money so they can keep the ER afloat.
So when a new private hospital or clinic opens that don't have a ER or trauma ward, its basically siphoning the funding stream away from hospitals whom do practice emergency medicine.
The real catch is that states often mandate that hospitals keep their emergency departments operational, as there are often only a few operating in populated areas to serve the general public. However, they often do not mandate that new hospitals open new emergency medicine departments.
This is just going to be more and more of an issue as we continue to ignore the fact that healthcare is a natural monopoly and should not be operating off a profit motive.
I work at the only trauma 1 hospital in my state and we just had to basically get a bail out for the same reason.
I used to be a part of the construction of hospitals, they have money. Finance bros wouldn't be a part of it if it wasn't profitable for them somehow. I would love to see real numbers.
Construction and the actual operation of hospitals have next to nothing to do with each other?
It depends on what kind of hospitals you are talking about. There's plenty of investment capital for orthopedic or heart hospitals/clinics. But no one wants to invest in hospitals with emergency departments. They only do it when they are forced to, just like in the article you just posted.
General hospitals and we had huge fucking budgets. We had to tone it down to make it look less "rich."
Hospitals are famously expensive to build, I would expect them to have a pretty huge budget compared to a normal facility the same size.
Plus, that's counter intuitive to your argument. If it was run by finance bros wouldn't you expect them to spend as little as possible on facilities?
Hospital networks aren't the cash grab they used to be, a lot has changed in the last 10-15 years, really since the affordable care act passed. Which if you read the article is when this hospital group first started having financial problems.
The way insurance companies responded to the bill was to do more business with private clinics and hospitals where they could set up in network reimbursement programs.