this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
834 points (91.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

6336 readers
2086 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I was also on the side of vote for Kamala fix it after because with Trump fixing is impossible with Kamala maybe. But whenever I see stuff like

45 Democrats Vote With GOP to Pass Bill Sanctioning ICC Over Netanyahu Warrant

Senate Overwhelmingly Rejects Sanders Resolutions to Block Arms Sales to Israel

it makes me doubt how feasible this approach would be too. Sure Kamala is factors of magnitude better than Trump for the USA, for Ukraine, for LGBTQ people, for women etc. But I can understand a US citizen with roots in the middle east etc not voting for Democrats after seeing disgusting stuff like this.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago

"PATRIOT Act" passed Senate 98 to 1. Partisanship is for complete morons.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

45 out of 215 Democrats voted for that or around 21% vs 90% of Republicans. This means that the crazy option is wildly unpopular and would never pass under a democrat. I'm not seeing the problem here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

45 out of 215 Democrats voted for that or around 21% vs 90% of Republicans.

21% of Democratic voters voting for Republican candidates would be completely unacceptable. Why is it ok for 21% of our representatives to vote for genocide?

Oh right. It's ok when it's the only thing centrists actually want.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

And "centrist" in the US really means far right.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

45 democrats didn’t vote the way you want? And how many republicans didn’t? Are you really saying both sides are the same?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No they are not but I am convinced that about 2/3 of the democrats don't give a shit about the party they are a member of nor its voters. If their only opportunity was to be a republican candidate they would jump at that opportunity without any internal moral conflicts. And I understand how frustrating it must be when a majority of a party that you are told to vote for has no moral issues with bombing a country where your relatives live to the ground.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are 215 Democrats currently serving in the house. The 45 that voted with Republicans don't even make up a quarter let alone 2/3.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I am talking about the Sanders vote though. I think, there were about 10 that said yes to stop selling weapons.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

two different wings of the same shitbird…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Not even different wings. Both are right wing parties. The left wing of this bird was long since broken.