this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
-10 points (38.6% liked)

Conservative

468 readers
164 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No it isn't. Forrest is a much more diverse ecosystem than grassland.

And from a purely economical point: you'd need to clear the forest and engineer something to make the ground suitable for the construction of the solar park. It doesn't make sense if there is an area without a Forrest.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It has become obvious that you have no concept of what the Great Lakes Region looks like.