People Twitter

5976 readers

613 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas

pelespirit

1317

WTF??? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 years ago by lewosadebu to c/whitepeopletwitter

203 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PrincessLeiasCat 206 points 2 years ago (21 children)

While the media posted by the influencer has been removed, numerous text interactions with the deleted posts from his followers are still on the platform. Some of those posts mention a child depicted in the photos as young as one and a half years old.

Source

To make matters worse, the image appears to have been on the platform for several days before being removed. Lucre even described the image in detail in a separate tweet, noting that it had been taken from a video. The video in question involved the abuse of three children, one of whom was reportedly strangled to death after the filming.

Source

The CSAM material was left up for FOUR DAYS (July 22-26) before he was even suspended. Then they let him "delete" it...and reinstated him. People commented during those 4 days DESCRIBING THE IMAGES.

What the FUCK please tell me this is worth a visit from the FBI, getting removed from the App Store, some massive GDPR violation, fucking something. How is this story not bigger news?

To put this in perspective, 4 graphic CSAM images that an account with 500,000 followers posted were left up on Twitter for 4 days. The person who posted the images was suspended for less than a day.

[–] ikapoz 22 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Do I want to know what CSAM stands for?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Child sexual assault material, unfortunately.

[–] ikapoz 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep. Didn’t want to know that.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, it’s a term everyone should know. It “replaces” the label child porn, because while it’s universally known as horrible, it’s not “porn.” It’s evidence of child sexual abuse. Hence “child sexual abuse material.”