this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
74 points (94.0% liked)

Fun Loops ▶️

336 readers
202 users here now

Posting interesting/cool/funny videos from Loops here

https://loops.video/

Thanks to @Bluefruit @lemmy.world for the icon and banner!

Discussion of and questions about Loops should go over in [email protected]

If the loop you're posting isn't original content uploaded by the creator, prefix the title with [R] for "reposted". For example, [R] Cute dog.

If you know the source for a loop marked [R], please comment with it!

Rules:

  1. Don't be a dick
  2. Don't make me add more rules

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

That sort is pretty bonkers. I agree with the no hire because it doesn’t really display an understanding but if I got that as an answer in a technical interview, it would be fun to dive into why that code was written and might turn into a hire if we peer just a bit deeper under the hood of the thinking. This is why “solve for x” technical questions suck unless you make the actual interview about the back and forth. Assume a correct premise if it works and tweak and change and poke and prod to really sus out if they understand what and why that was written.