this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

Cybersecurity

23 readers
8 users here now

An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!

Rules

Community Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
92
So, why do almost all banks, in the U.S. at least, only support the worst 2FA authentication method exclusively? And, this article doesn't mention SIM-swap attacks, which are unavoidable. It can't be (hear-me.social)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So, why do almost all banks, in the U.S. at least, only support the worst 2FA authentication method exclusively? And, this article doesn't mention SIM-swap attacks, which are unavoidable. It can't be that difficult to support an authenticator app.

https://gizmodo.com/feds-warn-sms-authentication-is-unsafe-after-worst-hack-in-our-nations-history-2000541129

#Cybersecurity

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

SSH keys are a public and private keys that you can use to sign and verify messages back and forth. passkeys are literally the same thing. the only difference is passkeys are unique per site and you store them in an encrypted file that you only need a single password to access vs an ssh key the passwords are per key pair.

essentially the passkey is used to sign a bit of metadata and then the service verifies that metadata matches the user via the public key on file in their system. but otherwise they're functionally the same thing as ssh keys.