this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
350 points (93.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2003 readers
1322 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the face of ‘eradication’, one trans activist is preparing to fight – and she’s sick of silence and neglect from her supposed allies. Raquel Willis tells Io Dodds why Republican bathroom bans are everybody’s problem

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Democrats were pretty cool about protecting trans people. But thanks to non-voters and $hill Stein voters (along with tens of millions of “low information” Trumpledorks), Trump has all three branches of government at his disposal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's crazy to see a party with a 3:1 fundraising advantage lose in a landslide and then blame the distant fourth place vote getter for the defeat.

Nobody seems to want to talk about how Democrats endorsed a genocide and how that may have shifted their popularity.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Considering Democrats are now complaining that their protection of trans people cost them the election, I wouldn't say they were all that cool to begin with. They use trans people as a political tool and then toss them aside the second it becomes inconvenient for them to support trans rights. Just look at how the Democrats have "defended" their newest trans colleague.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I guarantee you she does not want her colleagues white knighting for her or otherwise drawing attention to it. The entire way she has handled this has been “I’m not letting this be a distraction, I’m here to represent Delaware.“ That’s her decision and I’m glad her colleagues respect that instead of making it about them and how great they are for defending her.

[–] Joker 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just hours after Willis’s interview with The Independent, House and Senate negotiators revealed a bipartisan compromise spending bill that would ban military health insurance from covering transition care for children. On Wednesday, 50 House Democrats who previously denounced that provision voted in favor, and key Senate Democrats said they would reluctantly back it too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What did they get in return?

It's politics, they got something, what was it?

It doesn't say? Huh. I wonder why.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They got to fund the military.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

then double fuck them, how about the military passes an audit before they get more tax money to hand over to billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago

The problem with democrats is that they always hold progressive action overhead like a carrot. "Vote for us, we'll establish trans rights/universal healthcare/codify roe v wade!".

Then they don't do it because they want to use it as a fundraising and election platform next go around. If they just did things when they had power people would be more willing to vote for them.

And yes, I know that there are Republicans and independents blocking progressive action. But that doesn't excuse the DNC from doing what I described above as well as constantly shitting on popular progressive candidates.

[–] theonlytruescotsman 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not really, like their supposed protection of black people their protection of trans people is contingent on how the minority behaves.

That's not support, that's blackmail.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Username checks out

Not really, like their supposed protection of black people their protection of trans people is contingent on how the minority behaves.

"Behaves"?? You mean votes? Yeah it is contingent on how people vote. See gestures to everything

[–] theonlytruescotsman -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, behaves. Liberal darling Tim walz called the national guard on the Floyd protests long before any semblance of violence happened.

If any minority protests a Democrat, they go back to their kkk roots faster than you can say southern strategy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Sometimes opinions like this get downvoted and I wonder if Lemmy is really as progressive as we claim it to be.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What the governor called out the National Guard to protect bystanders and property? In case things went south fast?

Fascists, obviously. Well now I'm glad we lost. Whoever won will surely be much better for that.

Speaking of - since they lost, why the long face? Shouldn't we be celebrating? Hooray the sucky Democrats lost! They're the worst! Down with the Democrats! Yaaaayyyy

[–] theonlytruescotsman 6 points 2 days ago

Hey, thanks for proving my point, you're the type of person I was talking about.

I mean, yes massa, sorry massa, I won't be voting for my interests any more massa, you get my votes now massa.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Were they, because they were a heck of a lot more anti-trans campaign ads from Democrats then some of y'all want to admit.