this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
428 points (96.5% liked)

People Twitter

5380 readers
445 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chugs a gallon of water and scarfs down a whole steak. Bold of you to assume I'm more environmentally friendly than AI.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was gonna eat that steak anyway, whether I send zero or 100 emails today.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

well it's still like 1,800+ gallons of water for a single pound of prepared cow flesh, so..

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

this is probably not true

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Man the level of triggered I got while reading this really makes me question if I am a bad person, but I can imagine that in this age of corporate sponsored propaganda that some corporations benefit (Monsanto) from veganism. These comments have the opposite effect, such an absurd statistic without any point of reference or comparison is meaningless except to those who wouldn't question it either way. Shame-spreading won't solve the climate or world hunger

[–] usrtrv 10 points 1 week ago

It doesn't seem like their point was to trigger? Unless you're triggered by the word flesh?

I'm not a vegan/vegetarian. But I recognize from a purely thermodynamics perspective that meat is less efficient than a plant based diet. They're efficiency losses for feeding plants to another organism instead of just eating those plants directly.

Before agriculture, meat was basically required for humans. Let wild animals consume inedible plants and then hunt using very little of your own resources. Now that equation has been inverted since we control the entire chain of resources.

You can be mindful of environmental issues and efficiency without taking a moral stance on meat eating. There's really no easy answer, it's very complex. Pollution, water use, land use, pesticides, nutrition, etc are all factors.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

wow, you brought a lot of your own stuff to my comment.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

gallon of water

Am... Am I not supposed to be drinking water now?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a reference to how generative AI uses huge amounts of water.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Ahhh, okay. I really thought I'd missed a memo and the water wars were upon us