this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
441 points (99.3% liked)

Canada

7082 readers
331 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No Canadian companies involved in a shortened workweek trial intend to revert back to a five-day week, new research from 4 Day Week Global shows.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (17 children)

What's never clear in these sorts of articles is if there was any reduction in salaries, or increase in working hours. Like are people going from working 40 hours a week to 32 with no change to their paycheck? Or are they getting paid 20% less? Or are they still working 40 hours, just over 4 days instead of 5?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 4 day work week is based on the idea that people are more productive with less time to goof off. Work 32 hours for the same pay and you should see the same or better outcomes. So likely the case is yes

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I know that's the idea, but I can't imagine a lot of companies being eager to effectively pay their employees the same for 20% "less work". I know it's a good idea, I just have no confidence in companies. Just look how many of them forced people back to offices during the pandemic despite the safety, cost, and productivity benefits of working from home.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not 20% less work, 20% less time.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Again, I agree. I just don't think suits will see it that way

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Call it a KPI, trend it up. Boom suit support

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Of course they won't, but that doesn't mean that that's what's being discussed in these articles.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The suits are seeing it that way. Even if you don't read the article, it's in the headline my guy. They're keeping the 32h work weeks

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not in the headline that they are paying the same salary though, which was the question.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't say they were paid less, and it talks about the same output, so the logical inference is that the salaries stayed the same.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I believe I read elsewhere that pay and everything else stayed the same which was the point of the trial. The businesses didn't expect to like it but were so impressed with the results that they went ahead and kept it. It was an unqualified win for all parties.

AFAICT it really is as good as it sounds like, no gotchas.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The headline makes it sound like a large number of companies, but it's actually only a handful.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They are doing more work in less time (and are happier) the tests show.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I agree, but that is true for working remotely as well, and look how few companies still offer that now. Most companies don't like to make changes that make their employees lives better, even if there is no downside.

load more comments (15 replies)