this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
136 points (77.4% liked)

Technology

59958 readers
3275 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

because they have received their content from decades of already biased human knowledge, and because achieving unblemished neutrality is in many cases probably unattainable.

We could train the AI to pretend to be unbiased. That's how the news media already works.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What would neutrality be? An equal representation of views from all positions, including those people consider "extreme"? A representation that focuses on centrism, to which many are opposed? Or a conservative's idea of neutrality where there's "normal" and there's "political" and normal just happens to be conservative? Even picking an interpretation of "neutral" is a political choice which will be opposed by someone somewhere, so they could claim you're not being neutral towards them. I don't know that we even have a very clear idea of what "unbiased" would be. This is not to deny that there are some ways of presenting information that are obviously biased and others that are less so. But this expectation that we can find a position or a presentation that is simply unbiased may not even make much sense.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was being sarcastic. My opinion is that it is impossible for a journalist to be unbiased. And it' ridiculous to expect them to pretend anyway. I think news media would benefit from prioritizing honesty over "objectivity", because when journalists pretend to be objective, the lie is transparent and undermines their credibility.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, I agree that journalism can't be unbiased and that honesty and integrity would go a long way. it would also be nice if journalists actually tried to help people understand complex issues rather than just reporting in the shallowest possible way to get a knee-jerk reaction from the audience.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A lot of journalists, at least historically, wanted to do this. Unfortunately they've been more and more kneecapped over time by news companies either pushing for a bias, or for clicks.

[–] taladar 1 points 2 weeks ago

Or just cutting down the time they are allowed to spend on researching the issues properly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

That is what the big AI companies do, though they are actually just packaging up American corporate norms as "neutral".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Moreat a 11

Here's why America's economy is great, but we can't afford basic healthcare and education systems even third world countries have by now.